XEN Windows Server install causes “stop: 0x0000005d”

When attempting to install Windows Server 2008 R2 under XEN, after loading from the disc, the installer will blue screen with the error:

STOP: 0x0000005D (<4 hex values, last 3 being 0x0000000000000000>)

To resolve this, try to enable pae in your XEN configuration file. ie, add the following line:

pae = 1

I am currently using the following configuration under XEN 3.12. Hopefully this will help.

kernel = '/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader'
builder = 'hvm'
device_model = '/usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm'
maxmem = 4096
memory = 1024
vcpus=1
pae = 1
acpi=1
apic=1

name = "xenwin"

vif = [ 'type=ioemu' ]

disk = [ 'phy:/dev/VolGroup00/winserv08r2_disk,ioemu:hda,w',
         'file:/vm/iso/win2008server-r2.iso,ioemu:hdc:cdrom,r' ]

# Boot from the CD 
boot='d'

vnc=1
vncconsole=1
vncpasswd=''
sdl=0

stdvga=0 
serial='pty'
ne2000 = '0'
usbdevice='tablet'

on_poweroff = 'destroy'
on_reboot   = 'restart'
on_crash    = 'restart'

Sun v60x – Benchmark

Tested a school lab Sun v60x server with CentOS 5.5 loaded. It is a 1u full rack server and thus, uncomfortably loud.

Specs:
2x Xeon @ 3.06GHz
2GB Memory
2x 36GB 10k Disks

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: server: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.el5 -- #1 SMP Fri Apr 2 14:58:35 EDT 2010
   Machine: i686 (i386)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (6113.9 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (6112.7 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (6112.8 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (6112.8 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
   08:16:31 up  2:58,  9 users,  load average: 0.02, 0.66, 0.73; runlevel

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 19 2010 08:16:31 - 08:44:46
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        5016443.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1193.4 MWIPS (10.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1798.0 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        182385.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           52532.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        491880.2 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              328327.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  71385.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6120.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3269.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    767.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         410651.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0    5016443.2    429.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1193.4    217.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1798.0    418.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     182385.5    460.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      52532.0    317.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     491880.2    848.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     328327.0    263.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      71385.9    178.5
Process Creation                                126.0       6120.4    485.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3269.1    771.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        767.9   1279.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     410651.3    273.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         419.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 19 2010 08:44:46 - 09:13:05
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       10913892.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3875.1 MWIPS (10.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4163.8 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        119217.0 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           32092.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        364708.0 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              877013.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 251983.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              13102.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5817.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    820.7 lpm   (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1060775.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   10913892.7    935.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3875.1    704.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4163.8    968.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     119217.0    301.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      32092.8    193.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     364708.0    628.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     877013.1    705.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     251983.1    630.0
Process Creation                                126.0      13102.1   1039.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5817.9   1372.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        820.7   1367.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1060775.7    707.2
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         702.1

Screen: Disable the Visual Bell

To disable the visual bell for the current screen instance, hit:

CTRL+A, CTRL+G

For a permanent fix, put the following into the ~/.screenrc file

vbell_msg "bell: window ~%" # Message for visual bell
vbellwait 2 # Seconds to pause the screen for visual bell
vbell off # Turns visual bell off

VirtualBox: Could not find a storage controller

While I was trying to add a virtual disk to a headless virtual machine, upon running

VBoxManage modifyvm MachineName --hda DiskName.vdi

this error occurs:

ERROR: Could not find a storage controller named 'IDE Controller'

This can be resolved by replacing

<StorageControllers /> 

with

<StorageControllers>
  <StorageController name="IDE Controller" type="PIIX4" PortCount="2">
  </StorageController>
</StorageControllers>

Actually, scratch everything above. Use the following tutorial: http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=28273

Sendmail Hangs on Startup & in PHP

If Sendmail takes several minutes to start, and your PHP scripts hangs when attempting to send emails via sendmail (eg: using the mail() function), ensure that your hosts file has its host name as an alias to localhost.

For instance, your hosts file should look something like this:

[leo@crow ~]$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1               localhost.localdomain localhost
109.169.59.122                     crow

You would want to add your host name to 127.0.0.1:

[leo@crow ~]$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1               localhost.localdomain localhost crow
109.169.59.122                     crow

Once that’s done, Sendmail should start and work normally.

DamnVPS (ThrustVPS) – Aquatic Package Benchmark

The following is the unixbench benchmark ran on the XEN-PV Aquatic package offered at DamnVPS (ThrustVPS)

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: crow: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.33.3 -- #1 SMP Thu May 13 22:30:34 BST 2010
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   18:49:48 up  5:11,  2 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 30 2010 18:49:48 - 19:18:08
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       14337184.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2868.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1545.8 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        243675.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           62276.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        705056.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              363431.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  72559.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3171.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2853.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    389.9 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         421968.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   14337184.0   1228.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2868.0    521.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1545.8    359.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     243675.8    615.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      62276.1    376.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     705056.0   1215.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     363431.4    292.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      72559.7    181.4
Process Creation                                126.0       3171.4    251.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2853.2    672.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        389.9    649.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     421968.1    281.3
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         466.6

eTecc Review – Stay Away!

Here is my rant on eTecc Communications. Skip to the last paragraph to skip all the gory details.

I was hosted at SteadCom since April 3rd, 2010. Except for the two major downtimes, one due to PacificRack and the other due to some sort of network problems, I had a fairly pleasant experience with SteadCom. For $10 per month, I got 40GB disk, 1TB bandwidth, and 768MB memory (with the same in swap) on a Q6600 @ 2.40GHz processor. The benchmark results are somewhere on this blog; just search for steadcom.

What does this have to do with eTecc? Well, eTecc recently acquired all SteadCom VPS customers. Throughout the month, they emailed about 3 times with your standard “our company is the best” message, while reassuring that they will make the migration from SteadCom servers to eTecc servers as ‘seemless’ as possible.

On Wednesday, July 28, I got this email:

ATTENTION! SteadCom servers will be shut down on August 1st, 2010, if not sooner, due to recent datacenter complications on the behalf of SteadCom. Thus, the original migration schedule has been accelerated and we require your immediate attention.

If you should have questions or require assistance during this expedited situation, please do not hestiate to contact us at any time. We are here to help.

The seamless migration of your account from SteadCom servers to eTecc will begin July 27, 2010. This migration has been segmented into several pieces in order to ensure a fluid transition with little to no downtime. Based on the type of account that you have, OpenVZ, XEN, or a shared hosting environment, we have prepared the following schedules. If you need help determining the type of account that you have, please contact support.

(snip)

XEN Based Accounts

A new VPS account will be setup on your behalf, using the same Operating System as your previous system, on eTecc’s enterprise level Parallels Virtuozzo platform as of July 28th, 2010. You will then have the ability to migrate any data or configurations to your new account until SteadCom systems are closed on August 1st, 2010. If you should require assistance in this migration, please do not hesitate to contact eTecc support technicians, we will be happy to help.

Accessing Your Account

In order to access your new account, please login to our Web Site control panel to retrieve your new access credentials. Please note, for some accounts the accounting information was not provided due to SteadCom bookkeeping methods. Thus, those accounts will be prompted to confirm their billing information before access to their new login information is released.

(emphasis mine)

Okay, so I have 3 days before the SteadCom servers goes offline. 3 days notice that my existing server will go offline and that I must *manually* transfer all my data to their new VPS. Why they even bothered calling this a ‘seemless migration’ is way beyond me. “Okay, whatever” I thought. I expected that they would contact me shortly regarding my new VPS server login. Nope. eTecc simply did nothing until I contacted them about my new VPS IP late Thursday.

Even though the email said I can get my server info from the customer control panel, all that is displayed is

To access your IP information, please add a credit card using the “Add Credit Card” link at the bottom of this page.

Meaning, if I wanted my server details, I had to give them my credit card as that was the only option offered. After asking them about payment by paypal did they then give me a subscription button. It was only after I paid and waited for approximately 17 hours did they finally reply with my new VPS IP address, with nothing else; not even a root password for the new VPS. The customer panel still showed the same message about me needing to add a credit card. I guess they don’t consider payment via paypal ‘confirmation of billing information’. /sigh

Now I’m starting to get worried and frustrated. The SteadCom server is supposedly going to shutdown that night. I’ve paid them the amount due, and yet I still haven’t received my server login or any other details other than that my server IP is 68.169.197.152. Their staff was taking their sweet time replying to my tickets and I still have all my data to transfer.

Instead of bothering with this joke of a company, I ordered a new VPS at DamnVPS (ThrustVPS) with instant setup. I then canceled the paypal subscription to eTecc shortly after. Within an hour (faster than their usual support responses), Derek (the president of eTecc) emailed me, asking why I canceled the subscription. Having explained my reasons and my frustration, he kept refusing to refund the $10 that I paid the day before, even though I haven’t even been given the VPS login details other than the VPS IP (meaning, I couldn’t even use the service I paid for). It is now 5 PM Friday, and I’ve still yet to receive the server password for my eTecc VPS, with the SteadCom VPS planned to go down hours later.

However, with my DamnVPS VPS, I’ve recompiled, reconfigured and transferred all my sites from SteadCom to DamnVPS in 2 hours. Had I not moved to DamnVPS, my sites along with all my data would be lost, all thanks to eTecc’s gross incompetence.

TL;DR Version: I would suggest whoever is interested in VPS hosting to not touch eTecc with a 100 feet pole. They failed at every aspect of being a good hosting company. Slow, incompetent support, no service after payment, and their lack of initiative with their customer’s needs. This so-called server migration of theirs simply highlights their sheer lack of competence.

I understand if a host does not give refunds, but honestly, I gave them $10 for absolutely nothing. It’s like going to a coffee shop, paying for your coffee, and all you get is a cup with no coffee. No Refunds? Fine, so long as I get what I paid for. But in this case, it just shows that eTecc is simply nothing more than a scam. You won’t get a server, you’ll get their half assed attempt at giving you a server.

If you need a good budget VPS, get one with Rus at DamnVPS (ThrustVPS). Although I’ve only had this VPS for about a day, I have been on the DamnVPS’s beta and I’m confident the server will be as solid as when I tested it.

I’ve posted this review on WHT.

Ticket contents follows:

jQuery Lightbox2 resulting in IE Javascript Errors

Having needed to use a jquery lightbox plugin, in this case: Lightbox2 (huddletogether.com), my client noticed that it generated javascript errors on IE.

Message: Invalid argument.
Line: 116
Char: 165
Code: 0
URI: http://________.com/static/js/jquery.js

After poking around, it seems as though there was an extra ‘;’ which caused IE to messup.

Change the line:

$('#outerImageContainer').css({width: '250px', height: '250px;'});

on line 42 in lightbox.js to

$('#outerImageContainer').css({width: '250px', height: '250px'});

should fix the issue.

DamnVPS Beta VPS Benchmark

The following is the benchmark results from DamnVPS’s beta VPS. The beta VPS is based on XEN and contains 512MB RAM. The benchmark was ran on May 21, 2010. So far, the VPS is very solid, although I don’t have a lot of time to actually load up my databases and use do further testing.

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: vps.server.com: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.33.3 -- #1 SMP Thu May 13 22:30:34 BST 2010
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   03:18:25 up  9:54,  1 user,  load average: 0.45, 0.12, 0.03; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri May 21 2010 03:18:25 - 03:46:47
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       13500594.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2797.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1507.4 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        232638.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           60139.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        721702.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              349661.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  69585.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               2981.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2722.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    375.7 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         407419.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   13500594.2   1156.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2797.0    508.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1507.4    350.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     232638.3    587.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      60139.9    363.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     721702.9   1244.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     349661.2    281.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      69585.8    174.0
Process Creation                                126.0       2981.9    236.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2722.0    642.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        375.7    626.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     407419.9    271.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         450.1

RackVM VPS Benchmark

The following is the benchmark results from my ~$2/mo VPS at RackVM. The VPS is XEN based with 128MB RAM. For such a good price, it was hard for me to resist giving it a try. I’m surprised that the service is fairly decent, although the disk does sometimes lag. But for my requirements, the VPS is well worth it.

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: atlas: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Wed Mar 17 12:04:23 EDT 2010
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5504 @ 2.00GHz (4990.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5504 @ 2.00GHz (4990.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   21:28:07 up 15 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.26, 0.28, 0.27; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri May 14 2010 21:28:08 - 21:55:57
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       10049463.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1979.3 MWIPS (9.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1147.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        191500.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           51443.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        574281.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              272602.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  74736.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               2775.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2495.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    514.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         328683.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   10049463.0    861.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1979.3    359.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1147.5    266.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     191500.7    483.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      51443.9    310.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     574281.1    990.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     272602.5    219.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      74736.0    186.8
Process Creation                                126.0       2775.2    220.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2495.3    588.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        514.1    856.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     328683.3    219.1
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         389.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri May 14 2010 21:55:57 - 22:23:52
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       19260083.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3826.1 MWIPS (9.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1960.6 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        101886.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           25932.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        352427.0 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              570224.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 140125.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3907.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3761.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    563.7 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         608957.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   19260083.7   1650.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3826.1    695.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1960.6    455.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     101886.8    257.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      25932.7    156.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     352427.0    607.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     570224.6    458.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     140125.6    350.3
Process Creation                                126.0       3907.4    310.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3761.1    887.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        563.7    939.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     608957.2    406.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         494.9